|
In-person absentee voting for the November election begins September 24th at the Jackson County Election Board offices located at 110 N Liberty, Independence, MO.
Office hours are Monday – Friday 8:30 am to 5:00 pm. In addition, the Jackson County Election Board will be open the three Saturdays before the election, October 19th, October 26th, and November 2nd, from 8:30am to 12:30pm. To request a mail-in absentee ballot, visit S:\Forms\ABSENTEE BALLOT APPLICATION Instructions-Registered Voters.wpd (jcebmo.org). Absentee requests for the November 5, 2024 General Election must be received on or before Wednesday, October 23, 2024. For more information, contact: JCEB Offices – 215 N. Liberty, Independence, MO 64050 | (816) 325-4600 | [email protected]. Reasons you can vote absentee:
No Excuse In-Person Absentee Voting begins the second Tuesday prior to an Election. For absentee I.D. requirements Click HERE.
0 Comments
Missouri Independent: Missouri voters will decide whether to legalize abortion in November8/15/2024 Missouri voters will decide whether to legalize abortion in Novemberby Anna Spoerre, Missouri Independent Abortion will be on Missouri’s statewide ballot in November. An initiative petition to enshrine the right to abortion up until the point of fetal viability received final approval Tuesday, securing a place on the general election ballot. If the measure receives a majority of votes, Missouri could become the first state to overturn an abortion ban through a citizen-led measure. The Missouri Secretary of State’s Office had until 5 p.m. to certify all ballot measures that received enough verified signatures to qualify. It certified the measures as sufficient hours before that deadline. Also certified to be on the November ballot were proposals to legalize sports wagering and raise the minimum wage. Leaders with Missourians for Constitutional Freedom, the coalition behind the ballot measure, gathered at a press conference Tuesday to encourage Missourians to get out to vote. The coalition is headed by Abortion Action Missouri, the ACLU of Missouri and the state’s Planned Parenthood affiliates. “Politicians have tied doctors’ hands and the stakes could not be higher,” said Mallory Schwarz, executive director of Abortion Action Missouri. “ … With a yes vote on amendment 3 this November, we are taking back what’s ours.” In Missouri, the first state to ban abortion after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to the procedure two years ago, abortion is expected to be a focal point of the general election campaign. Missouri is among 18 states with an abortion ban, and among several states working to put abortion on the ballot. In each state that put the issue on the ballot, citizens ultimately choose to protect the procedure. “The measure takes away the right from every person who loses a child or a loved one because of negligence during pregnancy, labor or delivery the freedom to sue for malpractice and obtain compensation,” Stephanie Bell, a spokeswoman with Missouri Stands with Women, said in a statement Tuesday. Tori Schafer, director for policy and campaigns for the ACLU of Missouri, responded to the comment, saying the statement is “fully false” and that the amendment doesn’t impact malpractice laws already in place.
What would the amendment do?
Abortion is illegal in Missouri, with limited exceptions only in cases of medical emergencies. There are no exceptions for survivors of rape or incest. If the amendment receives more than 50% of votes in approval, the measure would legalize abortion up until the point of fetal viability, an undefined period of time generally seen as the point in which the fetus could survive outside the womb on its own, generally around 24 weeks, according to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Such an amendment would return Missouri to the standard of the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision, which also legalized abortion up to the point of fetal viability. Missouri’s amendment also includes exceptions after viability “to protect the life or physical or mental health of the pregnant person.” Missouri’s amendment also states that women and those performing or assisting in abortions cannot be prosecuted. Under current Missouri law, doctors who perform abortions deemed unnecessary can be charged with a class B felony and face up to 15 years in prison. Their medical license can also be suspended or revoked. Dr. Selina Sandoval, associate medical director for Planned Parenthood Great Plains Votes, said the right to make decisions about abortion is personal and she sees each day the barriers and hardships bans cause. “In Kansas right now, we are serving mostly out-of-state patients, including Missourians, who’ve had to flee their home states in order to simply access abortion care,” Sandoval said Tuesday. Missourians for Constitutional Freedom, the coalition leading the reproductive-rights campaigns, is headed by Abortion Action Missouri, the ACLU of Missouri and the state’s Planned Parenthood affiliates. A decade ago, when abortion was still legal with fewer limitations, more than 5,000 abortions were performed in the state, according to data from the Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services. But by 2020, that number dropped to 167 due to a series of “targeted regulation of abortion providers” laws passed, including a mandatory 72-hour waiting period between the initial appointment and a surgical abortion and mandatory pelvic exams for medication abortions.
Since the Supreme Court decision in June 2022 through March 2024, there were 64 abortions performed in Missouri under the state’s emergency exemption, according to data from the Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services. A recent study by the Guttmacher Institute, a reproductive rights research group, showed that in 2023 alone, 8,710 Missourians traveled to Illinois and 2,860 Missourians went to Kansas for the procedure, which remains legal in both states. Despite the relative proximity to clinics in the Illinois suburbs of St. Louis and the Kansas suburbs of Kansas City, abortion access for Missourians has remained precarious at best. Missourians hoping for abortions have increasingly found themselves competing for limited resources — including abortion funds and clinic appointment openings — especially as more southern states have outlawed the procedure, making Illinois and Kansas critical access points for women in states like Florida, Oklahoma and Texas. This has led many Missourians to increasingly rely on self-managed medication abortions. Rather than traveling across state lines, it’s estimated that thousands of Missourians received Mifepristone and Misoprostol to end their pregnancies at home in the past two years according to JAMA, the American Medical Association’s journal. On Tuesday, members of Missourians for Constitutional Freedom continued to return to their continued fears for women’s health care in Missouri if a ban remains in place. Missouri already has stark maternal health care deserts, high maternal mortality rates, and recently saw adecrease in applicants to OB-GYN residency programs. Schafer, with the ACLU, said the coalition plans to start rebuilding access to abortion on day one, if the measure passes. “We know that after passage, constitutional amendments take 30 days to go into effect in the state of Missouri,” she said. “And we are hopeful that clinics will be open and our teams will be working toward that as our goal.” Schwarz said they’ve been in contact with abortion providers about coming back to Missouri. “After we win this in November, the impact will be regional and across the country,” she said. “And and from abortion providers that we are in close regular relationship and contact with, people are thinking all the time about where the next clinic can be, where the next opportunity is for them to grow and be able to support more and more patients.”
Wide support despite initial delays
The initial attempt to place abortion on the ballot began in March 2023. Legal fights with Republican state officials over the ballot language and internal disagreements on whether to include a viability ban stalled signature gathering attempts until January. As a result, the coalition had just 90 days to fundraise and collect signatures across the state. Meanwhile, Republican lawmakers were prioritizing an attempt to raise the threshold for approving citizen-led ballot measures. After a series of Senate filibusters, including one thatbroke records at 41 hours, the legislation failed on the final day of session. Missouri House Speaker Dean Plocher on the day of adjournment said that if abortion made it to the ballot and then passed in November under the current initiative petition guidelines, “the burden of abortion falls squarely on the Senate and its leadership.” Despite these obstacles, the initiative petition garnered wide support across the state. As of July, the campaign raised nearly $7.3 million in donations, according to filings with the Missouri Ethics Commission. Missourians for Constitutional Freedom turned in 380,000 signatures by their May deadline, including from each of Missouri’s 114 counties. To qualify for the ballot, they had to get signatures from 8% of registered voters in six of Missouri’s eight congressional districts, which equates to about 171,000 signatures. As of mid-July, the campaign had turned in more than enough valid signatures to land on the ballot, according to preliminary records from Missouri election authorities. Once all verified signatures were turned in by election authorities in late July, the secretary of state’s office had two weeks to determine whether there were any final issues, like duplicate pages or missing affidavits signed by circulators. On Tuesday, the secretary of state’s office also certified ballot measures hoping to raise the state’s minimum wage and mandate paid sick leave and legalize sports wagering. A third proposal to authorize construction of a new casino near Lake of the Ozarks fell short of the needed signatures. This story was updated at 2:30 p.m. to include reactions from those supportive of and opposed to the amendment. Missouri Independent is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Missouri Independent maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Jason Hancock for questions: [email protected]. Follow Missouri Independent on Facebook and X.
Valley News Staff with additional reporting from Missouri Independent and Associated Press, Beacon: Missouri
Voters headed to the polls Tuesday for the primary election and to decide on two state amendments, rejecting an attempt by lawmakers to exempt childcare facilities from paying property taxes, and approving an amendment to require Kansas City to spend more of its municipal budget on policing, reinstating a policy that had been overturned by the state supreme court. (See additional reporting from Missouri Independent below). Locally, District 32 Missouri State Representative Jeff Coleman ran unopposed and will face Democrat Jennifer Cassidy in November. Missouri voters approve amendment requiring more police spending in Kansas Cityby Allison Kite, Missouri Independent Missourians on Tuesday voted to require Kansas City to spend more of its municipal budget on policing, reinstating a policy that had been overturned by the state supreme court. The race was called by the Associated Press at 11:30 p.m., with the amendment winning 51% to 48%. That means the Missouri Constitution will be amended to require Kansas City to spend at least 25% of its general revenue on police, amounting to tens of millions of dollars per year. While it provides funding for the department, Kansas City is the only major city in the U.S. that doesn’t have local control of its police. The Kansas City Police Department is governed by the Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners, which includes the mayor and four members appointed by the Missouri governor. That means while the City Council writes the checks for the Kansas City police, they have no control over how funds are spent. Between the 1950s and 2022, Kansas City was required to spend at least 20% of its general revenue on police and often exceeded that. But in 2020, as racial justice protesters pushed for police reform across the nation, Kansas City sought to exert more influence over the police budget. Following the protests, sparked by the murder of George Floyd in Minneapolis, Kansas City officials attempted to set aside $42 million in police funding — above its obligatory 20% spending — for “community engagement, outreach, prevention, intervention and other public services” in an attempt to increase police accountability. But the move was lambasted by Missouri Republicans, who claimed City Hall was trying to “defund” the police. Missouri lawmakers responded with legislation requiring Kansas City to spend at least 25% of its revenue on police, which passed in the spring of 2022 on a largely party-line vote with Republicans supporting increased police spending. Voters then, in the fall of 2022, approved the legislation with 63% of the vote. The policy was unpopular, however, in the Jackson County portion of Kansas City where 61% of voters rejected it. It passed in Platte and Clay counties, which include suburban parts of Kansas City. After the vote, Kansas City Mayor Quinton Lucas challenged the election in court, saying a summary printed on voters’ ballots “materially misstated” the cost of the proposal. The fiscal note summary accompanying the 2022 amendment said the requirement that Kansas City spend at least 25% of its revenue on police would result in “no additional costs or savings.” The state argued that because the city had voluntarily granted that much in the past, the amendment simply removed the city’s discretion rather than imposing a new cost. City Hall, however, argued the mandate could potentially cost other departments up to $38.7 million in budget cuts. The Missouri Supreme Court agreed with the city and ordered the results of that election be tossed and a new vote be held, paving the way for Tuesday’s vote. Missouri Independent is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Missouri Independent maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Jason Hancock for questions: [email protected]. Follow Missouri Independent on Facebook and X. Missouri voters reject property tax break for child care facilitiesby Allison Kite, Missouri Independent Missouri voters on Tuesday rejected an attempt by lawmakers to exempt child care facilities from paying property taxes, an incentive supporters hoped would help with the state’s day care shortage. When the Associated Press called the race at 10:30 p.m., more than 54% of Missourians had voted against amending the Missouri Constitution to offer the property tax exemption. It’s one of several attempts by lawmakers in recent years to take action on the state’s shortage of child care facilities. “This is just one incentive to try to make that easier for the facilities,” state Sen. Travis Fitzwater said during a committee hearing on the bill last year. According to the language on voters’ ballots, the exemption was “intended to make child care more available, which would support the well-being of children, families, the workforce and society as a whole.” An investigation by The Independent and Muckrock found nearly one in five Missouri children lives in a “child care desert,” where there are more than three children under the age of six for every licensed child care slot. Some areas have more than 20 children per licensed seat or no daycare access at all. Even in areas with plenty of licensed child care seats, staffing shortages mean facilities can’t operate at full capacity. It can be difficult to hire for child care jobs, which paid, on average, less than $12 an hour in 2021. And while COVID relief funding poured into Missouri to help with the shortage, it largely went to ZIP codes that weren’t child care deserts, The Independent and MuckRock found. It’s unclear how much money child care providers might have saved statewide if the property tax exemption had passed. Voters’ ballots said local governments were unsure what the fiscal impact might be to their budgets. But the hope for supporters was that saving child care providers money might help with the shortage. “It’s going to take an all-of-the-above approach to tackling the child care crisis,” Heidi Geisbuhler Sutherland, a lobbyist for the Missouri Chamber of Commerce and Industry, said in a hearing last year. When the legislation came before Missouri lawmakers, it had support from an array of child care and economic development organizations, including the chamber. Geisbuhler Sutherland said business owners have told the chamber that the lack of child care makes it difficult for companies to find workers. Missouri lawmakers have considered an array of options to deal with the child care shortage. This spring, Gov. Mike Parson pushed a package of child care tax credits, but the legislation stalled in the Senate because of ultra-conservative opposition to “welfare” or the attempt to “give away free child care.” Parson called for the tax credits in his State of the State speech in January, noting Missouri had enough licensed facilities to serve just 39% of children, and proposed a budget that increased child care subsidies by $51.7 million. He said: “It’s time for change.” Nina Hampton of Columbia voted at American Legion Post 202 and opposed the child care property tax amendment. “Corporations are paying off the politicians,” she said. “The poor guy keeps paying and paying but the corporations get everything.” The Independent’s Rudi Keller contributed to this story. Missouri Independent is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Missouri Independent maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Jason Hancock for questions: [email protected]. Follow Missouri Independent on Facebook and X. Missouri primary election 2024 resultsby The Associated Press, Beacon: Missouri Find live election results from the Aug. 6 Missouri primary election. Looking for Kansas results? Head over to this page. Election results for U.S. SenateElection results for Missouri governor, lieutenant governorElection results for attorney generalElection results for secretary of stateElection results for state treasurerElection results for U.S. HouseResults for Missouri Amendment 1 and Missouri Amendment 4Missouri primary election results for state House of RepresentativesSimply search the district number you are looking for and pick a county below to find results. Missouri primary election results for state Senate racesSimply search the district number you are looking for and pick a county below to find results. This article first appeared on Beacon: Missouri and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.
Voters head to the polls Tuesday, August 6th for primary voting. Polls are open from 6am - 7pm; voters in line at 7pm will be permitted to vote. Voters must present a valid photo ID issued by Missouri or the federal government in order to vote. If you do not have valid ID but are a registered voter, you may cast a provisional ballot.
To locate your polling location, visit Voting Locations | Jackson County Missouri Election Board (jcebmo.org) To view a sample ballot, visit Notice-of-Election-Sample-Ballot-Final.pdf (jcebmo.org). The KC Media Collective has compiled a primary voting guide for Kansas and Missouri voters: KC Voter Guide 2024 | Missouri and Kansas elections | KCUR - Kansas City news and NPR Missouri Primary Election Day FAQ: What you need to know to make sure your vote countsby Staff Reports, Missouri Independent Months of campaigning and TV ad wars will come to a close Tuesday, as Missouri voters head to the polls to pick their party’s nominee for Congress, the state legislature and nearly every statewide office. The Independent tried to answer some of the questions you may have about voting in Missouri’s primary. What time do polls open?Polls across the state open at 6 a.m. and close at 7 p.m. Voters in line by 7 p.m. are entitled to cast a ballot. Where do I vote?Before you head out the door, check your voter registration and polling location at GoVoteMissouri.com. Some local election officials said the state’s website has the most up-to-date information on the new polling sites. Others recommended going directly to the county’s website or calling local officials instead. The GoVoteMissouri.com website will also provide the information you need to contact your local election authority. How do I find out what’s on the ballot?Local election authorities provide sample ballots, which voters can study, fill out and bring with them on Election Day to use as a guide. They are typically posted on your county’s website. Researching your ballot ahead of time will help cut down on the time you spend at the polls, and local election officials are encouraging voters to do this. What are acceptable forms of ID to vote?Registered Missouri voters will need a photo ID issued by Missouri or the federal government in order to vote. If you do not have any of these forms of identification, but are a registered voter, you may cast a provisional ballot. Your ballot will count if you return to your polling place on Election Day with a photo ID, or the signature on your provisional ballot envelope is determined by your local election authority to match the signature on your voter registration record. If you cast a provisional ballot, you will receive a stub from your provisional ballot envelope with instructions on how to verify that your provisional ballot is counted. Accepted forms of photo ID for Missouri include: A non-expired Missouri driver’s license or a state ID A non-expired military ID, including a veteran ID card A U.S. passport or another form of photo ID issued by the U.S. government or the state of Missouri that is not expiredCan I wear a T-shirt with my candidate’s name on it?Missouri election law prohibits wearing political apparel to the polls, advocating for a candidate or issue within 25 feet of a polling place, or taking photos of ballots. Who can I call if I need help?Voters may call the Secretary of State hotline at 1-800-669-8683 with any questions or to file a complaint with the the agency’s elections division. A nonpartisan election protection hotline (866-OUR-VOTE) will also have volunteer lawyers ready to answer questions on election day. Missouri Independent is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Missouri Independent maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Jason Hancock for questions: [email protected]. Follow Missouri Independent on Facebook and X. Missouri Independent: KCPD funding, child care tax breaks: Missouri's August ballot issues explained7/18/2024
Click to set custom HTML
KCPD funding, child care tax breaks: Missouri’s August ballot issues explainedby Allison Kite, Missouri Independent Kansas City officials have another chance next month to fend off an attempt by Missouri lawmakers to force the city to spend more of its revenue on policing. But despite opposition from Kansas City leaders and activists, there’s no formal campaign against the ballot initiative, which was previously passed by Missouri voters but later tossed by the Missouri Supreme Court over deceptive ballot language. Instead, opponents of the proposal will try to get the word out without “gigantic checks,” said Kansas City Mayor Quinton Lucas. “But I don’t pretend to think that will necessarily win the day,” Lucas said. At issue is a question that will appear on Missouri voters’ August 6 primary ballot as “Amendment 4.” It asks whether the Missouri Constitution should be amended to require Kansas City to spend at least one-quarter of its general revenue on policing, an increase of close to $39 million. Missouri voters previously approved the spending hike with 63% of the vote in 2022. But the measure was unpopular with Kansas Citians. In the Jackson County portion of Kansas City, more than 61% of voters rejected the amendment. It passed in Platte and Clay counties, which include suburban parts of Kansas City. Lucas sued the state’s auditor and secretary of state, saying a summary printed on voters’ ballots “materially misstated” the cost of the proposal. He prevailed, and the Missouri Supreme Court ordered the election results be tossed out and a new vote be held. The police funding amendment is one of two questions on Missouri voters’ August primary ballots. The other, passed last year by the Missouri General Assembly and appearing on the ballot as Amendment 1, would exempt child care facilities from paying property taxes in an attempt to “make child care more available” to “support the well-being of children, families, the workforce, and society as a whole.” “We obviously have a child care facility shortage in our state,” state Sen. Travis Fitzwater said during a hearing on the property tax amendment last year. “We need to provide opportunities for folks that get child care.” A “yes” vote on Amendment 1 supports amending the Missouri Constitution to allow child care facilities to be exempted from paying property tax. On Amendment 4, a “yes” vote supports amending the Missouri Constitution to increase the minimum amount Kansas City must spend on policing from 20% to 25%. A “no” vote would leave Kansas City’s spending obligations at 20%, though city officials could voluntarily spend more.
Police funding campaign
The police funding dispute stems from the Kansas City City Council’s attempt in 2021 to impose some control over the Kansas City Police Department’s Budget. For more than 80 years, the Kansas City Police Department has been controlled not by the City Council but by a board of commissioners appointed by Missouri’s governor. The only city in the state and one of few in the nation that doesn’t control its police, Kansas City simply provides the funds for the department. While the city was obligated between 1958 and 2022 to provide the funding requested by the board — up to 20% of the city’s general revenue — it has little control over how it is spent. The city has often exceeded its 20% obligation. But following racial justice protests that took place in Kansas City — and across the nation — in 2020, City Council members attempted to set aside $42 million in police funding above its obligatory spending for “community engagement, outreach, prevention, intervention and other public services.” The move was criticized by Republicans in the Missouri General Assembly who voted to increase Kansas City’s obligation to 25% of its revenue. “Kansas City’s short-sighted move to defund the KCPD, if attempted again, will have lasting and dangerous consequences for our metro area,” state Sen. Tony Luetkemeyer said in a committee hearing in 2022, when the amendment was approved by lawmakers. Luetkemeyer, who lives in the suburbs of Kansas City, carried the legislation in 2022 to increase the city’s police spending obligations. He did not return a request for comment. The 2022 legislation passed the Missouri General Assembly on a largely party-line vote with Republicans supporting the increased police spending and Democrats opposing it. Lucas said voting no was the “only common sense solution.” Residents of Kansas City, he said, should be the ones to determine the policy direction of the city by electing local representatives. He said one year the council may need to increase police salaries and the next it may need to spend money on other needs, like firefighting. “Who should tell you that, ‘No, you can’t actually take care of your firefighters; you can’t take care of the nurses in your public hospital because you have to live by whatever Jefferson City is doing just for pure political pandering?’” Lucas said. Lora McDonald, executive director of the Metro Organization for Racial and Economic Equity, or MORE2, called the attempt by state lawmakers to force Kansas City to spend 25% of its revenue on policing “a political ploy.” “Why do you care what our police department has or doesn’t have?” McDonald said. “It’s not your business. It’s not your money.” Lucas said there was “no organized campaign” to persuade voters to reject the amendment. Last month, the Missouri Supreme Court allowed the issue to go on the August ballot rather than the November one, giving supporters and opponents just over two months to mobilize voters. According to Missouri Ethics Commission records, no spending committees have been organized to advocate for or against Amendment 4, and no independent groups have spent money in the race.
Child care tax credit
Along with the Kansas City police question, Missouri voters in August will get to decide whether to amend the state constitution to offer a property tax exemption for child care facilities. The proposal, championed during the 2023 legislative session by Fitzwater, is one of several attempts by lawmakers in the last few years to ease the shortage of child care facilities in Missouri. This spring, Parson and lawmakers attempted to pass a package of child care tax credits, but the legislation stalled in the Senate because of ultra-conservative opposition to “welfare” or the attempt to “give away free child care.” An investigation by The Independent and MuckRock found nearly one in five Missouri children lives in a “child care desert,” where there are more than three children under the age of 6 for every licensed child care slot — or no licensed slots at all. “This is just one incentive to try to make that easier for the facilities,” Fitzwater said during a committee hearing on the property tax exemption last year. Fitzwater did not return a request for comment. Fitzwater’s proposal was supported by an array of child care and economic development organizations and anti-abortion groups. Samuel Lee, a lobbyist for Campaign Life Missouri, said during discussion on the bill last year that the anti-abortion group supported the “pro-life, pro-family, pro-workforce development” legislation. “The pro-life movement has generally not been involved in areas of childcare,” he said, “although for our maternity homes and pregnancy resource centers, the lack of available childcare, the lack of transportation, the lack of housing have always been the three major issues for their clients.” The Missouri Chamber of Commerce and Industry also supported the measure last year. Its lobbyist Heidi Geisbuhler Sutherland said business owners told the chamber that the lack of child care makes it difficult to find workers. “It’s going to take an all-of-the-above approach to tackling the child care crisis,” she said, “but I think this measure is a great way to start.” SUPPORT NEWS YOU TRUST.
DONATE
Missouri Independent is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Missouri Independent maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Jason Hancock for questions: [email protected]. Follow Missouri Independent on Facebook and X. With 100% of precincts reporting, Mayor Michael Todd won re-election, defeating Dale Arnold with 58.92% of the vote. Reached for comment, Mayor Todd said, "I want to thank all the residents who have placed their faith in me for another two years. We have some great things coming with expansions of sidewalks, trails, road improvements, and improvements to our parks that I’m excited to continue to work with city staff on." In the only contested alderman race, first-time candidate Kyle Sole defeated former mayor Chuck Johnston in Ward I with 55.81% of the vote. Rick Knox in Ward 2 and Ryan Skinner in Ward 3 won their uncontested seats. Voters also overwhelmingly passed the proposed school board levy (Question 1) which will be used to increase teacher and staff pay in the district. The measure passed with 58.86% of the vote. Reached for comment, Grain Valley Schools Superintendent Brad Welle shared the following statement: "We wish to thank our school community for supporting our schools, teachers, and staff with the passage of the levy ballot measure. Our people tell us they love working here and this vote reinforces why - because this community is willing to do hard things to keep our schools the best they can be. We see the challenges many in our community face to keep up with increased costs and we do not take your support for granted. We will continue to be good stewards of our financial resources. I wish to thank our school board for setting the tone for our district. Under the Board’s leadership, our focus is on attracting and retaining a high-quality workforce. We also appreciate the efforts of parents and other community volunteers who stepped forward to get the word out about the importance of this ballot measure. Improved pay for our teachers and staff will take effect with the start of the new budget year on July 1." Incumbent Jared English was re-elected to another term on the Grain Valley school board, while first-time candidate Aaron Scully won the second open seat, defeating incumbent candidate Eddie Saffell and first-time candidate Paul Trusler. Unofficial results: Jackson County Election Board (9:50pm 4/2/2024)
As the April 2nd municipal election draws close, Valley News reached out to the candidates running for the Grain Valley School Board to answer a series of questions to learn more about their background and priorities.
Four candidates have filed for two open seats on the Grain Valley Board of Education. Current board members Jared English and Eddie Saffell have filed for re-election. Aaron Scully and Paul Trusler have also filed. Candidates are listed in alphabetical order, and other than minor spelling or grammatical corrections, the candidates' responses are provided as written. Jared English Please tell us about yourself (work background, volunteer service, elected positions held, etc.). I’ve been a resident of Grain Valley for roughly 20 years. My wife and I have two elementary-age children in the district. My work background is risk management. I was on Grain Valley Park Board for roughly 9 years. I also served as the treasurer for the Pathways of Honor, which is a Veterans group in Grain Valley. I’ve been on the School Board in Grain Valley for 12 years. Why do you want to serve on the Grain Valley School Board? I think that we have a great district, focused on the education of our children. As an experienced board member with strong ties to the community, I think I’m well-suited to partner with leaders in our district to ensure we continue to keep education our focus. The levy proposal on the April ballot seeks to address teacher and staff pay in the district. Teacher pay is often cited as a reason why districts struggle to attract and retain teachers. What other factors, besides teacher pay, do you feel are critical to address in the district to retain quality teachers and staff? In a word: Culture. Employees, regardless of industry, typically stay with an employer because the culture of the organization aligns with their values. I think the administration in Grain Valley has done an excellent job creating a culture that our staff value. We may never pay more than some of our neighbors, even with the levy. I think the key to successfully retaining employees (teachers, cafeteria workers, bus drivers, facilities workers, etc.) is to maintain a culture of respect that employees value. How would you assess the levels at which students are achieving academically in the district? What are areas of concern? The district has several methods of gauging success of our students. MAP tests are a good indicator of how the district performs compared to other Missouri schools. As I reviewed the data provided to the board, one area that jumped out at me was the “Class of 2027 Math” results. While there are several reasons for why the scores look low, this is area I’m concerned with and watching closely. Other tests provide additional insight as to how our overall school population is performing academically. I think its also important to identify those who are falling behind. Our board motto is, “every student, every day.” We mean that. We have a small percentage of students who struggle every day. We need to make sure we’re doing everything we can to support those kids and give them the education they deserve. What are the top issues the board should focus on in the next 3-5 years? Education should remain our number one priority over the next 3-5 years. The board approves a comprehensive plan every year. That plan also includes other key initiatives, such as facilities, security and communications with our patrons. I think all of these issues are important. The board receives regular updates from the administration on progress in these key areas. Another big issue is the continued growth of our community. Grain Valley continues to expand. This puts a great deal of stress on our district. Continuing to monitor growth and ensure we’re allocating resources to accommodate growth across the district is key to a good education. Eddie Saffell Please tell us about yourself (work background, volunteer service, elected positions held, etc.). I spent 40 years in the fire service, 10 as a volunteer in Harrisonville and the last 30 with the Central Jackson County Fire Protection District (CJC), retiring as a deputy chief. During that time, I have served as the president of the Grain Valley Chamber of Commerce and a Grain Valley / Blue Springs advisory board member to Truman Heartland Community Foundation. I have also served on numerous community project committees such as the Mayor's Prayer Breakfast (Blue Springs) and the Truman Heartland Scholarship Committee. I am completing my 12th year as a member of the Grain Valley Board of Education. Why do you want to serve on the Grain Valley School Board? My commitment to the school board comes from two points: my belief that education is critical to our community's success. A strong school system brings families, which in turn brings business which strengthens our community and allows for better resources and programs for our families and business owners. I received my graduate degree later in life, so my belief that education is key doesn't stop at high school, but continues throughout life. To instill that mindset in our children, we have to give them the best education we can from the beginning and I believe I have, and will continue to help Grain Valley Schools to build that success. Second is my dedication to public service. I have been in some form of public service my entire adult life and I have been interested in local government special districts (school, fire, library) the entire time. I currently work for the City of Grain Valley so, even in retirement, I remained in community service in a different form. The levy proposal on the April ballot seeks to address teacher and staff pay in the district. Teacher pay is often cited as a reason why districts struggle to attract and retain teachers. What other factors, besides teacher pay, do you feel are critical to address in the district to retain quality teachers and staff? Finances are always the easiest to blame and sometimes the hardest to fix. The levy will allow us to make a large impact on the teacher salary and benefit issue, but we also have to think out of the box and find ways to entice teachers to come to Grain Valley and then stay. Ensuring a positive culture of respect and trust has little financial impact in comparison to other components, but can keep a teacher, or any other staff member, in our system. Wanting to go to work and enjoying where you work are critical to our success. If we give our staff members the support and resources they need daily, such as monitoring and maintaining class sizes, it can make their work less stressful. Open and honest 360 degree communication can improve morale. This starts at the top and moves through all levels of the organization. How would you assess the levels at which students are achieving academically in the district? What are areas of concern? In general, our students perform well at all levels. When we look at high school graduations, scholarships, college applications and so on, Grain Valley continues to perform at a very high level. In all elementary and middle school grades, Grain Valley continues to perform above others, especially across the state. My main concerns will always be in the STEM (science, technology, engineering, and math) components because these are the keys to today's business world. We have identified, through standardized testing, some areas we could improve on and are always working on programming and instruction to address those areas. What are the top issues the board should focus on in the next 3-5 years? As always finances will be a topic of concern. As Grain Valley grows and our student population increases, we will need additional, or expanded, facilities and staff to continue to offer programs to continue to provide our students and families the best educational experience we can. School safety and security is a priority. The world we live in dictates we continually adjust our security for buildings and events to ensure everyone's safety. This has many levels and requires open-minded and forward thinking to accomplish. Staff recruitment and retention is key. As mentioned, finding ways to not only compensate our staff, but also give them a work environment they can be happy to be a part of and proud of. Aaron Scully Please tell us about yourself (work background, volunteer service, elected positions held, etc.). I am an RN and work full time at the Kansas City VA. I am also a member of the Missouri Air National Guard as a critical care air transport team nurse. I have not held any elected positions. My wife and I volunteer within our church in a variety of areas: medical team, security team, and membership class. We also have 5 children, and currently have foster children in our home. We have been foster parents for almost 4 years. Why do you want to serve on the Grain Valley School Board? I want to serve on the school board, because I have a vested interest in the education of my children. I desire to see the overall success of children, to see them succeed in whatever path they choose, and to see them become productive members of this community and our society. The levy proposal on the April ballot seeks to address teacher and staff pay in the district. Teacher pay is often cited as a reason why districts struggle to attract and retain teachers. What other factors, besides teacher pay, do you feel are critical to address in the district to retain quality teachers and staff? I got an opportunity to hear a presentation at a board meeting from a couple of teachers, and during their presentation, another point was mentioned which was their days off (sick days, personal days). They would like to see a PTO (paid time off) time of leave system in place, and I could see the benefit of moving to that type of system, if it were to be a desired benefit of the educators and staff. How would you assess the levels at which students are achieving academically in the district? What are areas of concern? I believe the district is tracking the academic success levels to a degree, and I recall seeing some of the results at a board meeting several months ago. I would reiterate that the goal of the district should be to see each child succeed in whatever chosen path, and become productive members of our community. An upcoming concern that I have will be the use of AI (artificial intelligence), and how it will impact education. What are the top issues the board should focus on in the next 3-5 years? Top issues for the next 3-5 years: continued improvement of safety for staff and students; budget deficits and finding a way to eliminate them; that the district continues to maintain the priority of school is, an education; and that teachers will want to stay in the district. Paul Trusler Please tell us about yourself (work background, volunteer service, elected positions held, etc.). I'm a devoted husband to I believe the most beautiful, loving and intelligent women I know. I'm a father of 7 kids (4 boys, 3 girls.) Grandfather to one boy. All of which are either currently in or have graduated from GVSD. I've been a member of the ironworker local union 10 for over 25 yrs. I'm a member of First Baptist Church of Grain Valley where I've served in many aspects of the church and have served as property chair for over 5 yrs. Why do you want to serve on the Grain Valley School Board? To be more active in my community. To better serve in the school system in which my children and grandchild attend. To be a voice for teachers and students. The levy proposal on the April ballot seeks to address teacher and staff pay in the district. Teacher pay is often cited as a reason why districts struggle to attract and retain teachers. What other factors, besides teacher pay, do you feel are critical to address in the district to retain quality teachers and staff? Pay may be one of the leading factors for teachers leaving, but they are also one of the highest stressed professions. One way to help this would be for the schools to be consistent in the rules and punishment they have. Another way is to recognize teachers constant struggles. Teachers are the backbone of the school system. We should empower them to do their job to the best of their abilities. I've found most teachers are self-driven individuals. We need more people like them. How would you assess the levels at which students are achieving academically in the district? What are areas of concern? For the most part I believe the district to be doing well academically. I would like to explore better ways of instructing kids who learn with their hands (kinesthetic learners) or who are visual learners. What are the top issues the board should focus on in the next 3-5 years? The board should focus on safety and success of the children and teachers. As the April 2nd municipal election draws close, Valley News reached out to the candidates running for Mayor and Board of Aldermen to answer a series of questions to learn more about their background and priorities.
In contested races, candidates are listed in alphabetical order, and other than minor spelling or grammatical corrections, the candidates' responses are provided as written. Mayor Mike Todd has filed for re-election, with current alderman Dale Arnold filing to challenge Todd for the position of mayor. In Ward I, former mayor Chuck Johnston has filed for the seat currently occupied by Arnold. Kyle Sole has also filed to run for the Ward I seat. In Ward II, current alderman Rick Knox will run unopposed, as will current Ward III alderman Ryan Skinner. In the course of requesting comments from aldermen for this candidate profile, current Ward III alderman Ryan Skinner and Ward I candidate Kyle Sole called for Ward I candidate Chuck Johnston to withdraw from the race due to two recent arrests related to DWI charges. Other candidates and current aldermen have also taken to social media to also call for Johnston to withdraw from the race. Valley News reached out to Johnston to give him an opportunity to comment on the call for him to withdraw from the race or to comment on the DWI incidents. Johnston replied, “No comment.” Links to prior reporting on the 2022 charges and current court data on Johnston’s arrest record are provided below: Johnston arrested for suspicion of driving under the influence: Quick News - Grain Valley NewsJackson County Circuit Court records: Case.net: Name Search Results by Case (mo.gov) Mayor candidates: Dale Arnold Please tell us about yourself (work background, volunteer service, elected positions held, etc.). I have lived in Grain Valley since 1986. Moving here and working for Central Jackson County FPD for over 30 years. Retiring with disability in 2017. Married to my wife Shelia for 46 years. We have two children raised in the Grain Valley School District. I have a long list of service over many years: a few are having served on the Citizens Advisory Committee for the Grain Valley School District, as well has a member of the Planning and Zone Board for the City of Grain Valley, and as Alderman. I have always tried to help wherever I can and have been involved with the Grain Valley Police Department Night Out Against Crime, the GV Haunted Hayride, the Grain Valley Fair Days, and the Historical Society. I have served as President of the GV Band Parents Association and GV F.O.C.U.S. I have also been active outside the City serving on a number of State Boards and Foundations. Why do you want to serve as mayor? I feel I will bring a different approach to meeting the goals of the Grain Valley Citizens, as well the challenges that we meet each day. There are programs that I feel could be moved along with a bit more focus and direction. Most of all we have a great community and that is something I want to keep. What do you believe are the three most important issues the City should be focused on in the next five years and how would you support these efforts as mayor? I feel the three important issues are Taxes, Growth and the cost of that growth. Which all of these are closely tied together. I've heard and felt, our taxes is one of the biggest issues. You have to ask how did we get here. Every tax being collected was voted and approved by the public. Typically for schools, streets, parks plus water and sewer improvements. All services we have grown accustom to and want the best service. In the city, with the growth we have experienced, it requires long range plans that anticipate future growth. This comes with a high price tag. One way to offset this is to see that the growth meets our needs. Because if our tax base grows it will spread that cost out helping to reduce the individual tax burden. Residential growth helps, but in most cases the cost of service outweighs the taxes generated. I feel the answer is commercial growth. Higher property values equaling more taxes generated in turn reduce what each has to pay. While the term of office for Mayor is two years, there are many things I feel that could be done. Which can have a long lasting effect, well past five years. Economic development is a big part of that picture. We have seen that, around the I-70 corridor. We now need to see that spread across the rest of our community. In the recently released Jackson County Public Health Community Health Assessment, the top issues of concern for surveyed residents were distracted driving (44%), access to public transportation (43%), affordable housing options (38%), access to affordable healthcare (36%), and substance abuse (31%). In what ways should the City be working to move the needle on these issues and how can the mayor and board of aldermen support these efforts? (FINAL - Grain Valley (jcph.org)) While these are all issues county wide and we experience some in our community, we are, I feel in a better stance and the report show this as well, as opposed to intercity and other areas in Eastern Jackson county. Continued efforts to enhance our police force has a direct effect on distracted driving and substance abuse. Recent studies show we have a significant volume of available rental housing for the housing need. Healthcare and transportation are issues that extend beyond our city limits, which hamper our effectiveness. We are working with OATS bus to meet these need were we can. The City is scheduled to complete construction on a new police station this spring which addressed facility needs for the department after a failed vote on a community campus in June 2020. What is your vision for City Hall and the Community Center now that the police station project is nearing completion? We pay dearly at tax time, often wondering what we get in return. It is paramount to me, to show more value for your taxes. My vision is threefold, First, I would like to continue work on our trails program for connectivity in the community. For all those who want to walk and bike to destinations across town. This has been a number one item listed in all the surveys that the city has had taken. I think more attention to meeting these goals is warranted. Currently trails are hit and miss with short pieces being developed through grants, that are slow to realize. Grants help with our budget however I feel there are other ways to pay for this and should be used to move forward. Second, our Community Center size falls short of meeting our communities needs. I feel it is time to move forward with a new Community Center. Past plans that failed were promoted as a no tax increase. Since that time we have moved forward in smaller steps, with the new Police station. This opened up the other side of City Hall for city staff, meeting the overcrowding issue there. With some maintenance and upgrades City Hall should meet our need for some time to come. The Police station used about a third of the fund slated for the previous plan. Which stands to reason that funding is still possible today without a tax increase, especially with the recent property re-assessments, ample funding should be available. With a larger Community Center to meet our needs, allowing events to be held locally, instead of leaving to go to other communities. Instead it will serve as a magnet to bring events to Grain Valley. With this, I feel a water park as opposed to a pool, offers more for the children to do, than just wade around in the water. This would be a more cost effective approach to serving our youth. Also one of the concepts that was discussed in the past project, an Amphitheater. This would be a great venue for our local high school band to perform. It would be so exciting to see Jazz and Concert band performances and more local acts and small theatrical performances, all this would be a possibility. Wrap all this up in a park area filled with trails and picnic/rest areas, pickle ball courts and basketball courts. All in walking distance to the New library and neighborhoods on the old Sni A Barr Farm. Making it a show case of family areas for all to use. I believe this is possible without a tax increase. Giving more value for your taxes. Last the current Community Center could meet further needs with repurposing and focused as a possible senior center. Of course, this would all be up to you the voters. I look forward to hearing from you with your thoughts and suggestion. Michael Todd Please tell us about yourself (work background, volunteer service, elected positions held, etc.). I am a lifelong resident of Grain Valley and a graduate of Grain Valley High School. I have been married to my wife Tosha for 15 years. We have a daughter and two stepsons - all of which attended or are attending Grain Valley Schools. I’m currently finishing up my 24th year as a special education teacher. I’m involved in the Grain Valley Fair, Grain Valley First Fridays, and the Grain Valley Historical Society. I’m currently President of the Grain Valley Fair Board and the Grain Valley Historical Society. Prior to being elected Mayor I served for 3 terms as Ward 2 Alderman. I am currently completing my 6th term as Grain Valley Mayor. Why do you want to serve as mayor? As I’ve stated before I love Grain Valley. I’ve lived here my entire life and I have chosen to raise my family here. I feel it is important to give back to your community as much as you can, that is why I have been a devoted elected official for the time that I have been. It is also the reason that I’m involved in the activities I am. My family loves to see everyone having a good time at the Fair and First Fridays. It is important to me to preserve the history of Grain Valley and that is the reason for my involvement in the Historical Society. Grain Valley is more than just a city. It is my home and home to thousands of others, and I would like to keep serving as Mayor to make it the best home for everyone. What do you believe are the three most important issues the City should be focused on in the next five years and how would you support these efforts as mayor? One of the three most important issues is making transportation improvements. A couple of these key improvements we have already started making headway towards. They will continue to be a priority for me. The Duncan Road/Buckner Tarsney intersection is one of these projects. We have a lot of residents who currently avoid this intersection. This is an inconvenience to our residents and leads to tax leakage to other communities like Blue Springs. Instead of using Grain Valley businesses many residents are spending their money elsewhere, because it is too difficult to get to town. Another example of a needed transportation improvement is the Kirby Road/Eagles Parkway intersection. This is the intersection at the entrance into the High School. At the beginning and ending of the school day this area can have significant congestion. These are just several of examples. There are other areas that need added turn lanes or possible signals as well. Of course this is in addition to our regular road maintenance program. Another of the most important issues is parkland and trails. We are currently making improvements to Armstrong Park with the addition of a new playground. I would like to see some other improvements there like the possibility of adding a splash pad. We also have the old Sni A Bar Farms property, which we started clearing so it can be usable green space. We need organize a focus group of residents to explore the possibilities for recreational activities on this property. These two parks serve the residents of Ward 1 and Ward 2, but as you can see, we are lacking green space/parkland for the residents of Ward 3. We need to continue looking for a solution by identifying a place in Ward 3 that works for us to start moving forward. Along with park improvements, we need to continue with the great progress we are making with our trails. We are currently in the design phases for the extension of the trail/sidewalks on Buckner Tarsney and Eagles Parkway. Both of these pieces are crucial in improving the walkability of Grain Valley. Finally, one of the most important issues to continue to focus on is taxes. The city has continued to lower our tax levy as we have had more development. Unfortunately, with county assessments, the cost of living, and other factors, our residents haven’t seen the impact of those decreases. We can continue on this path of decreasing the tax levy by continuing to grow our industrial and commercial base. Future growth could potentially see the addition of an interchange between our current interchange and Oak Grove. This would provide development opportunities for both communities. With MODOT making improvements to I-70 to expand lanes this may be the time to take a serious look at this. In the recently released Jackson County Public Health Community Health Assessment, the top issues of concern for surveyed residents were distracted driving (44%), access to public transportation (43%), affordable housing options (38%), access to affordable healthcare (36%), and substance abuse (31%). In what ways should the City be working to move the needle on these issues and how can the mayor and board of aldermen support these efforts? (FINAL – Grain Valley (jcph.org)) Distracted driving and substance abuse are concerns that the Police Department can help identify ways we can support. We are fortunate to have a new Police Chief who brings with him a wealth of knowledge and experience. He is also connected with a lot of organizations in Missouri that could help with these two issues. Access to Public Transportation is going to be a hard one for Grain Valley to address effectively based on our location from bus routes serving the city. We have, however, had great success with OATS transportation for our seniors. From home ownership to the cost of rentals, the cost of affordable housing is a significant concern. This is a difficult balance to create because we want to be able to offer affordable housing, but at the same time we want to make sure that our mixture of single family and multi-family housing is an adequate ratio. Hopefully the cost of living will come back down, and the cost of housing will lower along with it. In Grain Valley we do not have a lot of places where residents can access doctors. There have been conversations about possible Urgent Care Clinics, which could help residents access affordable healthcare more locally. However, this is not something that is currently happening. The City is scheduled to complete construction on a new police station this spring which addressed facility needs for the department after a failed vote on a community campus in June 2020. What is your vision for City Hall and the Community Center now that the police station project is nearing completion? City hall and the community center need to be looked at separately: City Hall needs some help. The hope has been that once PD is relocated that city hall could be remodeled to work. I’m not an engineer or architect so I’m not sure what that would look like or what the cost would be. We have to look at it and see what makes sense with the cost associated with the construction. It is not as easy as just moving people over to the PD side of city hall because evidence rooms, booking rooms. and jail cells don’t translate to offices easily without a lot of work and expense. Every city survey we conduct has recreational activities towards the top. Most of those activities are ones associated with a Community Center. Right now, our Community Center/Pool is not addressing the wants and needs of our community. Moving forward, we need to establish a focus group to look at options we can consider. By no means am I proposing a new Community Center to the extent of what was voted on in 2020. I consistently get questions about adding things like pickle ball courts and adding to our popular senior activities. we are currently at capacity with many of our activities. We need to have a cross section of our community look at what could be done and then give the Board of Alderman some options to look consider. Board of Aldermen candidates: Ward I: Chuck Johnston Please tell us about yourself (work background, volunteer service, elected positions held, etc. I have served one term as Mayor, five or six terms as Alderman. Approximately ten years on the Grain Valley Lions Club holding every officer position. Served over ten years as Treasure of the Grain Valley Chamber of Commerce. Served six years on the Board of Directors for State Bank of Missouri. I was named the Grain Valley Citizen of the year in 2008 and Pillar of the Community in 2008.The thing I love the most and enjoyed the most though is for the last twenty-eight years I have owned and operated the Grain Valley Santa Bus. I will stack the hours I have donated to this town against anyone since I have been a part of this community. As you visit with constituents in your ward, what are their top concerns? How do you propose to work with the board to address these concerns? The main concerns have remained the same the entire thirty-six years I've been a part of Grain Valley, roads, sidewalks and curbs, high taxes, and wasted spending. My main focus again will be spending on road Maintenace and all infrastructure. When I ran for mayor i had promised the same thing. In my term we increased proposed spending for road Maintenace from $1,050,000 to just over $3.3 Millon over the three years I was able to affect the city's budget. I was also supported and with the help of the citizens of this town got approval for the new Police Station soon to be completed. This is a major step forward in improving the capabilities of our Police Department that should last us for many years to come. In turn this freed up space at the current City Hall that again should eliminate the need for replacement well into the future saving the citizens money and helping the tax burden. I have always been a frugal person in both the spending of my finances and those that I represent. In the 2020 election I was instrumental in having the proposed sixty plus million dollars City Hall Complex being voted down. This was something that wasn't necessary could and has been mostly resolved at much lower cost to the taxpayers. What do you believe are the three most important issues the City should be focused on in the next five years and how would you support these efforts? This was pretty much addressed in my comment to the previous question. I will say that I have and will always be true to my proposed promises and will do my best to carry through on those promises. In the recently released Jackson County Public Health Community Health Assessment, the top issues of concern for surveyed residents were distracted driving (44%), access to public transportation (43%), affordable housing options (38%), access to affordable healthcare (36%), and substance abuse (31%). In what ways should the City be working to move the needle on these issues and how can the mayor and board of aldermen support these efforts? (FINAL - Grain Valley (jcph.org)) These are all difficult issues to address in a town our size I will support and seek funding for all issues that affect the majority of citizens and not spend on things the aimed at a select few. The city is scheduled to complete construction on a new police station this spring which addressed facility needs for the department after a failed vote on a community campus in June 2020. What is your vision for City Hall and the Community Center now that the police station project is nearing completion? Again, these issues were addressed in my response to question #2 with the exception of the community center. I completely support all the efforts that have been done in the past to meet the growing needs of the community. I know we're still in need of an expanded community center and I fully support that if it's done in a cost effective and affordable means. But I want to make sure it addresses the actual needs of the community not someone's pipe dreams. Ward I: Kyle Sole Please tell us about yourself (work background, volunteer service, elected positions held, etc. I’m Kyle Sole, a 34 year old father of one son, Husband to my beautiful wife, USAF Veteran, former Law Enforcement Officer, and now I work at the Nation Security Campus. After serving six years in the Air Force, I was honorably discharged at the rank of Staff Sergeant. My job was a Pavements and Heavy Equipment Operator. Basically, I was responsible for building and maintaining Airfields, as well as roads, sidewalks, curbs, utilities and any other horizontal construction on military bases. I am very thankful for everyone who has served in the military. Being born and raised in this area, I am extremely proud and grateful for the experience I received while in Iraq, South Korea, Hawaii (Joint-Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam AB) and Las Vegas (Nellis AFB). After serving our Country, I decided my next mission was to serve our community. I went to the Police Academy and shortly after graduating, I was hired by the City of Grain Valley for six years. During that time, I fell in love with this community and I am proud to call it home. I’m proud to have my son in our schools, and grateful to have family and friends throughout this city. I am honored to have the opportunity to possibly serve our community again. As you visit with constituents in your ward, what are their top concerns? How do you propose to work with the board to address these concerns? As I have contacted various neighbors within Ward 1, the topic that has been brought up the most is the maintenance of roads and curbs. This issue is very important to me and as a member of the board of Alderman I would be welcome to come together with Public Works, other board members, and our residents to identify the most critical areas of pavement needing repair. Whether it be from resident feedback, road inspections, or data analysis, it’s important to continue working together and ensuring the budget allocation for these items is correct. I have seen some streets and curbs that look absolutely awful, such as Hillside Court and want to make sure the residents on side streets are not forgotten. Having a background in repairing pavements, I want to ensure the repairs are not just done, but done correctly. It is more cost effective to repair something right the first time, rather than repeat the same ‘patch job’ every month. What do you believe are the three most important issues the City should be focused on in the next five years and how would you support these efforts? 1. Pavements (Roads, curbs, sidewalks), as previously stated, ensure the budget is correct and have open communication between the Board, maintenance crews, and residents. Open communications between board members who will be working together, and understanding the needs of each Ward is a must. 2. Retention at the Police Department. Our city had been a revolving door for great Police Officers and Grain Valley shouldn’t be a stepping stone for them to go to another agency. Recently, it appears the Police Department is on a better path that needs to have continued support from the members of the board. With that being said, former Mayor Charles “Chuck” Johnston, whom I am running against, has recently been involved with the law in a negative manor. Having plead guilty to Driving While Intoxicated- Alcohol in June of 2023, he was arrested again in September of 2023 for another DWI-alcohol charge. The Board of Alderman is held to a higher standard and I must question the ethics of Chucks Johnston’s decision to run for Alderman, especially when the Chief of Police serves as a direct report to the board. Our city needs to maintain a good relationship between the board members and the Police Department, without our Officers worrying of retaliation for conducting there jobs correctly. 3. Taxes. I can confidently say the community as a whole is feeling the negative effects of this economy and the last thing we need is increase to our household budgets. In addition to those paid taxes, our tax dollars should not be making unnecessary purchases and not holding onto property that has no cost benefits. In the recently released Jackson County Public Health Community Health Assessment, the top issues of concern for surveyed residents were distracted driving (44%), access to public transportation (43%), affordable housing options (38%), access to affordable healthcare (36%), and substance abuse (31%). In what ways should the City be working to move the needle on these issues and how can the mayor and board of aldermen support these efforts? (FINAL - Grain Valley (jcph.org)) With a top issue of Distracted Driving being Identified at 44%, I am very aware of the dangers of this from my time as a Law Enforcement Officer. Recently, Missouri passed The Siddens Bening Hands Free Law. This bans drivers from using electronic communication devices for a broad range of activities while driving on roadways. The law became effective on August 28, 2023 and is a good step in the right direction, and we should encourage our local Police Department to educate drivers when they are contacted. This topic can be addressed in many ways, but working with the High School and School Resource Officers, young divers could lead the way by building good driving habits as they learn to drive. We, as parents, also need to take accountability and not demonstrate these poor driving habits to our children. The topic of Access to Public Transportation 43% could be addressed by figuring out where in Jackson County this need is. If Grain Valley residents are needing this resource, the possibilities of route expansions and ride-share programs should be explored. Affordable housing option concerns are at 38%, I believe it is important for our city to maintain its value, higher standards, and keeping Grain Valley a desired place to live. With that being said, its no secret our taxes are HIGH, and I want to do what I can to prevent them from being any higher. The concern of Affordable Healthcare is understandably at 36%. As we all know, there’s nothing cheap about healthcare and there are many who can not afford it. I would encourage our city to explore options for those who are uninsured and/or low income by partnering with healthcare providers and supporting incentives for clinics who come to our city. With substance abuse being at 31% concern in our County, we need to continue to help and support those who are effected. So many people are hurt by this and I encourage our City, and Board, to continue working with all first responders in getting our citizens the help they need. Whether it be a medical emergency, or someone who genuinely wants to spot abusing a substance and wants to attend a rehabilitation program. We need to ensure resources are provided to our first responders, schools, and any other persons in need to provide help. The city is scheduled to complete construction on a new police station this spring which addressed facility needs for the department after a failed vote on a community campus in June 2020. What is your vision for City Hall and the Community Center now that the police station project is nearing completion? As we complete the new Police Station, I believe the city and board should explore cost of various projects for a new City Hall and the Community Center. These options could range from remodeling the current facilities, moving into a different existing building, or building new buildings. The real estate location of the current City Hall and Community Center could be of significant value in commercial use, which could potentially cover costs of the project. The most cost-effective long term solutions need to be explored. Ward II: Rick Knox Please tell us about yourself (work background, volunteer service, elected positions held, etc.) I joined the Central Jackson County Fire Protection District in March 1971 as a volunteer. I continued as a volunteer until May 1st 1985 at which I became a career Firefighter with them. I spent the next 35 years with C.J.C. retiring May 1st. 2020 obtaining the rank of Assistant Chief, I retired 35 years to the day that I became a career employee. I'm am running for my third term as a Ward 2 Alderman. As you visit with constituents in your ward, what are their top concerns? How do you propose to work with the board to address these concerns? As most know, I ride all over Ward 2 with my English Mastiff on his golf cart. There are three things I hear the most often. First, is our roads and drainage. The City put into place three years ago a program to bring our roads up to the standard they should be. This program is working, but it will take time to get all the roads done, the roads didn't get to the condition they are in overnight and they won't be repaired overnight. Second, is our taxes. The City rolled back taxes last year only to have the tax payers saving wiped out by the County's large increase. The City is trying extremely hard to bring in business to help remove the tax burden from our citizens. Third, the citizens in Ward 2 feel the City is spend to much time infringing on the home owners rights such as not allowing a storage box in the back yards and the push to stop home owners from parking vehicles such as boats and trailers in their back yards without spending their hard earned money on concrete pads. Most I have spoken to want no part of the City pushing this on them and feel that it should be up to the home owner associations to control what they want in their neighborhoods. For the record, I agree with this stance. In the recently released Jackson County Public Health Community Health Assessment, the top issues of concern for surveyed residents were distracted driving (44%), access to public transportation (43%), affordable housing options (38%), access to affordable healthcare (36%), and substance abuse (31%). In what ways should the City be working to move the needle on these issues and how can the mayor and board of aldermen support these efforts? (FINAL - Grain Valley (jcph.org)) As far as distracted driving, I feel the only way to curb this is a higher consequence, higher fines, suspended licence and jail time. Weather it's running a red light (which I saw three times today alone) or driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol. Distracted and impaired driving puts everyone at risk. I'm not sure what the City can do at this time on the matter of public transit, affordable housing or affordable health insurance. Curbing substance abuse I believe starts at home. Parents need to be proactive with their children. Parents are the first line of defense on abuse. The school and Police programs can only do so much, parents need to get much more involved with it at home. The city is scheduled to complete construction on a new police station this spring which addressed facility needs for the department after a failed vote on a community campus in June 2020. What is your vision for City Hall and the Community Center now that the police station project is nearing completion? The new Police station is a much need improvement for our City, and dedicated Officers, something I worked and pushed very hard for. I would now like to see the City work on a plan for a new City Hall to be built in the future on the South property, along with that a park that rivals Armstrong Park minus the ball fields on the Southwest corner of the property giving citizen in the South a nice park with an adjacent Community center that ties into the trail system. Ward III: Ryan Skinner Please tell us about yourself (work background, volunteer service, elected positions held, etc.) My name is Ryan Skinner, and I currently hold the position of Ward 3 Alderman, having been elected in April of 2022. I've been happily married to my wife Laurel for five years, and together, we are proud parents to our wonderful daughter, Hayden, who is two and a half years old. In 2020, we built our home in Rosewood Hills. Over the past four years, we've experienced immense joy being part of the Ward 3 community. The warmth and kindness of our neighbors, coupled with the widespread support from the community, have made our time here truly special. I grew up in the county just outside Grain Valley and attended school here until my graduation from GVHS in 2009. Following that, I pursued higher education at the University of Central Missouri, where I earned a degree in Criminal Justice and Political Science in 2012. After completing my studies, I made the decision to serve my community as a police officer. Upon graduation, I was recruited by the Boone County Sheriff’s Department and relocated to Columbia, Missouri, where I served as a police officer for five years. I was a proud member of the Fraternal Order of Police (FOP) lodge 100 and 50. Following my time in Columbia, I returned to the metro area, working as a police officer in Oak Grove for one year before transitioning into the private sector. Currently, I am employed by an electrical manufacturing company headquartered in Kansas City, Missouri, specializing in the production of utility metering equipment. As the Utility Manager, I frequently travel across the country, collaborating with various utilities. This role has afforded me the chance to appreciate the remarkable diversity and distinctiveness of our nation and its cities. With experience in both the public and private sectors, I have gained valuable insights into the challenges confronted by city staff, as well as the broad array of economic and social factors affecting our city. I look forward to continuing to serve our community for another two years as one of your Alderman in Ward 3. As you visit with constituents in your ward, what are their top concerns? How do you propose to work with the board to address these concerns? As I engage with constituents, it's clear that their primary concern in Ward 3 is infrastructure and public safety. The rapid growth experienced north of Interstate 70 presents significant challenges for our city in keeping up with the demands on roadways, intersections, and the accompanying rise in crime. As expansion continues for the foreseeable future, infrastructure and public safety will remain top concerns in Ward 3. Addressing public safety, there's a growing concern about crime spilling into our city from surrounding areas. To tackle this issue, we've implemented technological advancements within our police department to enhance crime prevention and response capabilities. This includes deploying license plate recognition systems, new computer software, establishing a data analysis position, and integrating other cutting-edge tools to bolster our law enforcement efforts. Moreover, the appointment of Police Chief Ed Turner in the Spring of 2023 has provided strong leadership to spearhead proactive initiatives ensuring the safety of our community. Witnessing the transformation of our police department since my election in April of 2022 has been remarkable, and we're committed to continuing this progress. With the completion of our new police station in May, the overwhelming response to our police officer recruiting program, and the implementation of new technology, the future looks promising for public safety in Grain Valley. When it comes to infrastructure, Mayor Todd's leadership has led to a significant surge in projects, particularly in roadway and sidewalk enhancements. We've partnered with the Missouri Department of Transportation (MODOT) to pursue a grant aimed at upgrading the Buckner Tarsney Rd and Duncan Rd intersection, a critical priority for Ward 3 in my assessment. Thanks to the unwavering commitment of the city and Mayor Todd, we're approaching the final stages of engineering design for the new intersection. Pending approval of the grant from MODOT, construction is poised to begin soon. By directly confronting these infrastructure challenges, investing in cutting-edge technology for our police department, we aim to enhance public safety and infrastructure to meet the evolving needs of our growing community. I am dedicated to working closely with the board and relevant stakeholders to ensure that the concerns in Ward 3 are effectively addressed, and our constituents' voices are heard. What do you believe are the three most important issues the City should be focused on in the next five years and how would you support these efforts? Over the next five years, I believe the three most important issues we should be focused on are infrastructure, public safety, and employee retention and recruitment. First and foremost, infrastructure remains a pressing concern like I mentioned in my previous comments. The maintenance and improvement of roadways, intersections, and sidewalks are vital for the city's continued growth and prosperity. As the population increases and urban areas expand, there is a growing demand for intersection improvements along with sidewalk and walking paths. Investing in infrastructure not only enhances the quality of life for residents but also supports future commercial and residential growth. Secondly, ensuring public safety is paramount like I mentioned in my previous comments. As the city grows so will crime and it's essential to prioritize measures that protect the well-being of our citizens. We must continue to provide a level of service we are all accustomed to. This includes adequately equipping our officers, implementing community policing initiatives, and investing in crime prevention tools like technology. By fostering a safe and secure city, we can promote social cohesion and attract businesses and families looking for a desirable place to live and work. Lastly, employee retention and recruitment are critical for maintaining a skilled and dedicated workforce. As the city grows and evolves, it's essential to retain experienced employees while also attracting new staff. This involves offering competitive salaries and benefits, providing professional development opportunities, and fostering a positive work culture. For example, I recently proposed a motion, which was successfully passed, to amend a resolution concerning workplace improvements. This amendment resulted in an increase in approved maternity and paternity leave for our employees to 6 weeks, a change that I believe is a fundamental benefit for our workforce. By prioritizing employee satisfaction and engagement, the city can enhance productivity, efficiency, and innovation across all sectors of city operations. In the recently released Jackson County Public Health Community Health Assessment, the top issues of concern for surveyed residents were distracted driving (44%), access to public transportation (43%), affordable housing options (38%), access to affordable healthcare (36%), and substance abuse (31%). In what ways should the City be working to move the needle on these issues and how can the mayor and board of aldermen support these efforts? (FINAL - Grain Valley (jcph.org)) As a former law enforcement officer, I am keenly aware of the dangers associated with distracted driving and substance abuse, which are significant concerns for the residents of Jackson County. Both the state and our city have laws in place to address driving while intoxicated (DWI) and texting while driving, and I firmly believe in the importance of enforcing these laws and holding violators accountable. I also believe that access to affordable healthcare is essential for the well-being of our residents. In the future, I would encourage the city and board to explore options for partnering with healthcare providers to establish free or reduced-cost clinics for physicals and dental care for those who are uninsured, underinsured, or have low income. I would advocate for the same accessibility to mammograms for women who also fall under those circumstances. Additionally, I would support incentives to attract medical providers to open clinics in Grain Valley, ensuring our citizens can access local healthcare instead of enduring long distances for treatment. However, on a more personal note, I believe the Public Health Community Assessment shines a spotlight on another important issue: leadership and ethics. According to the state of Missouri, 28% of traffic deaths in the state are caused by drunk drivers, ranking it as the 11th-highest rate of drunk drivers involved in fatal crashes in the nation. Unfortunately, our city is not immune to the dangers of drunk driving accidents. Given these statistics and the painful reality, it deeply troubles me that former Mayor Chuck Johnston is seeking to run for office again (Alderman Ward 1), especially considering his recent arrest for DWI-Alcohol in September 2023. This arrest occurred less than a year after he was previously arrested for DWI-Alcohol in Grain Valley in September 2022 and convicted of the same charge in June 2023. Former Mayor Chuck Johnston is currently serving 2 years on probation for the previous DWI conviction, and violated the law yet again when he was arrested for DWI-Alcohol the second time just 6 months ago. As public officials, we have a duty to uphold the laws that we are sworn to protect. It is unacceptable for anyone, especially someone in a position of leadership, to violate these laws while simultaneously expecting our law enforcement officers to enforce them. As a board member, we frequently vote to allocate funds for extra patrol to enforce DWI laws and various other law enforcement expenditures. I question the ability of someone who is ethically and legally compromised to make decisions that could potentially place themselves in further legal trouble, such as a third DWI arrest. Ethically, there are serious concerns about the integrity and credibility of a candidate who has a history of disregarding laws related to impaired driving. This type of behavior undermines public trust and raises questions about their ability to effectively serve in a position of authority, for example, the Police Chief serves as a direct report to the Board of Alderman. As elected officials, we must hold ourselves to the highest standards of conduct and lead by example in respecting and abiding by the laws of our community, especially when 43% of our citizens believe distracted driving is a top issue facing our community. I wholeheartedly agree with our citizens, and I urge all current Board Members and candidates for office to join me in respectfully asking Former Mayor Chuck Johnston to withdraw his candidacy for Alderman Ward 1. The City is scheduled to complete construction on a new police station this spring which addressed facility needs for the department after a failed vote on a community campus in June 2020. What is your vision for City Hall and the Community Center now that the police station project is nearing completion? My vision for City Hall and the Community Center is to extend the usability of our current building for at least another 5 years, if not longer. With the police department relocating, this creates space for expansion, while still accommodating the need to retain the existing jail for court nights. I am cautious about allocating excessive funds towards renovating the existing City Hall but am committed to ensuring it remains functional for the foreseeable future. Looking ahead, I envision utilizing the city-owned property at Buckner Tarsney and Sni-A-Bar for a new City Hall and Community Center, complemented by a park and other public amenities. I supported the removal of the dilapidated house on this property to open it up for public use, mitigating safety and liability concerns associated with its deterioration. Furthermore, I propose selling the current land where City Hall and the Community Center are situated for private development, maximizing its potential while generating revenue for the city. This strategic approach allows us to revitalize our municipal infrastructure, enhance public spaces, and foster economic growth in our community. A public hearing regarding the proposed developments in the Crossroads area, including the proposed relocation of the Kansas City Royals ballpark, will be held Monday, March 11th at the Jackson County Courthouse in downtown Kansas City. The session will serve as a forum for residents, property owners, business owners and all interested parties to voice their concerns, insights and thoughts regarding the proposal for a new Jackson County sales tax to fund a new downtown stadium.
What: Public Hearing on Proposed Crossroads Developments Date: Monday, March 11, 2024 Time: 3:00 p.m. Location: Jackson County Courthouse, 415 E. 12th Street, Kansas City, MO 64106 Legislative Assembly Area, 2nd Floor The Royals’ announcement of their intention to construct a new stadium complex, complete with team offices, a hotel, residential units and entertainment venues, alongside infrastructure improvements, has ignited a mix of excitement and concern among community members. The potential displacement of businesses and residents in the Crossroads Arts District has prompted calls for careful consideration and open discussion of the project's implications. “As Chairperson, I am honored to facilitate this important public hearing, ensuring that every voice is heard regarding the proposed developments in the Crossroads area,” 5th District Legislator Jeanie Lauer said. “It's imperative that we engage in open dialogue and considerate decision-making to address the concerns and aspirations of our community." "As Vice Chair, I am committed to fostering a transparent and inclusive discussion during the upcoming public hearing,” 3rd District At-Large Legislator Megan Marshall said. “Our community's input is invaluable as we navigate the complexities of the proposed developments in the Crossroads area. Together, we can shape a future that reflects the needs and values of Jackson County." Jackson County Executive Frank White, Jr., expressed his appreciation for the leadership of Chairperson Lauer and Vice Chair Marshall, stating, "Their dedication to fostering an open dialogue on this matter is commendable. I only wish that we had been made aware sooner of the Royals' plans, which involve displacing people and businesses from the Crossroads. It's crucial that we take these concerns into account as we move forward." The public hearing will offer a platform for transparent discussion, enabling the community to share their views, seek clarifications and understand more fully the proposed developments and their impacts. The input gathered during this meeting will be instrumental in guiding the County's actions concerning the stadium project and the associated sales tax proposal. In-person absentee voting and absentee requests for the April 2, 2024 municipal election began February 20th. All voters can vote in person at the Jackson County Election Board at 110 N Liberty, Independence, MO, stating a reason. Two weeks preceding the election a reason is not required to vote in-person absentee.
Reasons you can vote absentee:
For more information on absentee voting, visit Absentee Voting | Jackson County Missouri Election Board (jcebmo.org) Sample ballot for April 2nd municipal election: 04.02.24-Sample-Ballot.pdf (jcebmo.org) |
Categories
All
Archives
September 2024
|
Grain Valley NewsGrain Valley News is a free community news source published weekly online. |
Contact Us |